Hoskinson: Why Cardano Founder Argues XRP Faced a Major Loss in Wyoming Stablecoin Saga

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, argues that XRP suffered a significant setback during the Wyoming Stable Token (WST) project.

Over the past few weeks, Hoskinson has actively criticized the process of selecting blockchains for the WST initiative. He believes the selection was unfair and biased, ultimately sidelining Cardano and other notable projects.

Although Ripple recently gained approval for its RLUSD stablecoin from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), Hoskinson maintains that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) lost a critical chance to expand its liquidity and visibility.

Why XRP’s Liquidity Was Impacted

Hoskinson insists the WST project could have significantly bolstered liquidity for the XRPL.

He explains that Ripple’s RLUSD system was built to rival Circle’s solutions. However, the WST initiative selected Circle’s project instead of embracing Ripple’s infrastructure.

According to Hoskinson, if Ripple had been included in the process, Wyoming could have issued millions of dollars in tokens using the RLUSD infrastructure. This could have improved XRP’s liquidity across major exchanges, a benefit Ripple missed.

Allegations of a Conspiracy in the Selection Process

Hoskinson has alleged that powerful organizations like Consensys, Circle, and BlackRock collaborated to control the WST project’s blockchain selection.

He claims that individuals with ties to these groups heavily influenced the decision-making commission. In his view, this led to biased outcomes favouring Ethereum-based solutions.

Hoskinson has repeatedly emphasized that Cardano, XRP, and Bitcoin were unfairly excluded due to this alleged collaboration.

How the WST Multichain Vision Was Abandoned

Initially, the WST project was intended to support multiple blockchains.

Hoskinson contends that this vision changed when Anthony Apollo, the executive director of the WST commission, became involved. Apollo, who has a background with Consensys, allegedly shifted the project’s focus toward Ethereum.

As a result, the initial plan to evaluate prototypes for various blockchains was replaced by an opaque and exclusionary process.

Read Also: Cardano Surges 8%: Can It Maintain the $1 Support?

Stellar vs. XRPL: A Controversial Choice

Choosing Stellar over the XRPL for the WST project has sparked significant debate.

Hoskinson highlights the stark differences between the two projects. The XRPL boasts a market cap of $140 billion and daily trading volumes in the tens of billions. In contrast, Stellar has a $13 billion market cap and just $1 billion in daily trading.

Despite these differences, Stellar was selected. Hoskinson questions how Stellar could outperform Ripple’s technology under the scoring criteria, labelling the decision inconsistent.

Hoskinson Continues Criticism of the Wyoming Stablecoin Initiative

Hoskinson has not eased his criticism of the WST project’s selection process.

He argues that excluding Cardano, XRP, and Bitcoin reflects a lack of fairness in blockchain adoption. He believes this has broader implications for the crypto ecosystem, as it limits innovation and competition.

Hoskinson aims to promote transparency and inclusivity in future blockchain initiatives by highlighting these issues.

Ripple’s RLUSD Success: A Silver Lining or Missed Opportunity?

The NYDFS’s approval of Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin was a notable achievement. However, Hoskinson believes it cannot replace the missed opportunity in Wyoming.

He stresses that the WST project could have demonstrated Ripple’s capabilities on a larger scale. Instead, the biased selection process left Ripple sidelined.

Hoskinson suggests that Ripple’s RLUSD infrastructure was uniquely positioned to address the WST project’s needs. Unfortunately, this potential went unrealized.